Global Warming Might Have Been Nice . . . (Sigh)
The Climate’s not ours to change, Que Sera Sera

Last Thursday morning (03/01/2012) when I awoke, the temperature was 27 degrees Fahrenheit; the sky was absolutely cloudless. The previous day’s heavy snow was holding down the branches of these magnificent fir trees, causing them to point as steeples toward heaven. The rising sun greeted each tree-tip with a bright good morning kiss as the crackling fire in our wood stove spoke softly and comfortingly of the fading dreams of global warming.

Just last month we were snow-bound most of a week by a 30-inch accumulation. Have you ever tried to walk in 30 inches of powder snow? This much snow is very uncommon in our micro-climate. There are, by the way, hundreds of micro-climates in these Coast Range Mountains of Oregon. Good luck to all “Global Warming” researchers with their tidy government grants..

It’s becoming apparent that anthropogenic (man-caused) Global Warming probably won’t become a confirmed reality in this century, certainly not in my lifetime. But if “they” do manage to get us out of our cars and our airplanes and chase the 18-wheelers off the Interstates, our lifestyles will be reduced to rubble . . . except for those of the government class, the currently rising oligarchy. Please, let’s put those monsters back in their place and restore “government of the people.”

Already, “cap and trade” monkey business has been installed at the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency.) It was quietly done “in the dead of night” by presidential fiat. Wake up people! The progressives are getting their way, inch by inch and sometimes mile by mile as we sleep. Our Constitution has been interpreted as a charter of negative liberties (BHO) omitting what the government must do for you. Yikes!! BHO complains about government being too small. I’m telling you he’s carving out a socialistic state where “the people” become dependent on the oligarchy. His “spreading the wealth” rhetoric is code for communism.

On November 3rd, 2008, during the presidential election campaign, we were warned:

“So, if somebody wants to build a coal plant, they can — it’s just that it will bankrupt them, because they are going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.” — BHO

The You Tube video and audio has been removed from websites.

But what I remember hearing is really very close to the words above. Congress voted twice against “Cap and Trade!” It was downright autocratic to “let” The Environmental Agency just do it.

Proving global warming or climate change is one thing, but proving that mankind is the culprit is at least an order of magnitude more difficult. The easy part is noting a noxious smoke stack. The mind-boggling aspect is that smoke coverage is akin to field theory: The “field strength,” if you will, is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, and that’s on a day with wind from all directions at once! If that makes no sense, don’t worry. Neither does global climate change prediction.

For over two years now, the climate change con artists of East Anglia University and elsewhere have moved their “Global Warming” concoction to a different burner. This dubious science is now emerging from the telephone booth disguised as a mild mannered reporter. Now that “Climate Change” is preferred buzzword under a shell, we must keep an eye glued to see if he will suddenly don his cape.

We are not even close to predicting Global Warming. The problem is too complex at this stage of human understanding. It’s analogous to applying orbital dynamics when all we can comprehend is: “The earth is flat.”

Even the know-it-alls of today’s academia must do better than this. Someday perhaps, computer models crunching on mammoth amounts and many kinds of exotic data could, I suppose, cough up convincing predictions that the earth is getting warmer, or cooler. But even then our response to these predictions must not be motivated by political power, or our USA will be no different than any ordinary country with social classes being even more distinct than they are now.

I have no problem with debating postulates, establishing axioms and theorems or even routine applications of theories that provide truly useful and practical solutions to everyday life. But until our “knowledge base” about world climatology and our ability to translate it properly become adequate realities, we will not be able to predict or declare Global Warming or cooling, particularly the anthropogenic type.

Yes, cap and trade, that despicable shell game is already established. We don’t need it, we don’t want it and we must halt, even reverse, this process. God help us. God is already the maker of the most wonderful air-born dirt filter. He had it ready long before we found the abundance of coal He provided.
And . . . if global warming comes, it will come because God’s creation plan had it ready to go as he ordained. God can change the world’s climate in a word; mankind can make a plume of smoke but it will not make a significant change on any continent, much less the globe.

The ego of mankind, especially that of the Bull Headed Oligarch is far more noxious than “greenhouse gasses.”

. . . Dick

Posted in Current Issues | 3 Comments

Remembering 911

Do you remember where you were on September 11, 2001? I would be very surprised if anyone cannot specifically remember what they were doing on that horrible, surreal day when a well organized group of Islamic terrorists used three airliners, full of passengers, as guided missiles to hit the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. A fourth airliner, United 93, was hijacked over Cleveland to hit either the Whitehouse or the US Capitol building. Instead, the hijackers were overcome by the passengers who brought it down in a field in Southwestern Pennsylvania.

Mary and I were out on a camping trip. The timing for the trip was set by a quilting event that Mary wanted to attend at North Bend, on the Oregon coast. Our first camping spot on Sunday evening, September 9, was a place just west of Corvallis called Alsea Falls, a very typical forest campground in the Oregon Coast Range. Alsea Falls was a pleasant place to stay all day Monday, with the plan to move on Tuesday morning, September 11.

One thing I like to do when on such a trip is to send out an e-mail when we experience something special. The following is an e-mail I sent out in the evening of 911.


Subject: We’re on the Edge
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:32

I awoke this morning as the light began penetrating our wooded campground at Alsea Falls, OR. Aside from the distant chirping of a log loader, all was quiet. All seemed well, after struggling in dreamland with a terrible scene. I can’t remember what it was, but it was bad.

Immediately after breakfast, we folded everything and headed west on highway 34 through some incredibly beautiful timber, gracing a rugged section of the Oregon Coast Range.

Then, from the car radio, we heard the unbelievable reports of today’s work of evil men. I asked Mary to please wake me from this nightmare. It seemed to be an extrapolation of what I dreamt last night, yet this was far beyond the capability of my mind to conjure.

As we rolled down the fabulous Oregon coastline, now into the mist, now the sunshine, the radio continued its reporting, sometimes clarifying, sometimes making wild speculation, its own form of sunshine and mist.

Then as we crossed the bridge into North Bend, Lars Larson was inviting callers to his radio show (heard all around Oregon) to make comments.

It was at this moment that a lady from North Bend called and asked if she could offer a prayer. Lars said, “Please do.” It wasn’t a short, timid prayer, but a heart-felt prayer asking for God’s mercy and comfort for those individuals suffering loss.

It was sunshine penetrating the mist.

Paul said:
“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”
Ephesians 6:12 NIV

These men were following the orders of the “forces of evil.” Man will retaliate against man. It’s man’s way. We need to prepare our hearts for the reality that will probably come. This is no mere “nightmare.”

Remember also what Jesus said:
“Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.”
Matthew 10:28 NIV

Tonight we are camping at Cape Blanco, the farthest west edge of the lower 48. But after the events of this morning we are all on a different edge.

Dick and Mary

(Sent VIA Amateur Radio and Winlink 2000 from W7DHS to the e-mail port at W6IM)

Another ten years have passed, and I don’t see a solution coming. Indeed the issue is worse, especially in Europe. Islam has never been interested in understanding Christianity, but I don’t think Christians understand Muslims either. This point becomes moot however, because a little understanding only seems to reveal the impasse more clearly. Just a few years back, we often heard that the God of Islam is the same as the God of Christians. Well, that sounds nice, except that each considers the other as infidel which nullifies the concept. The Muslim looks at violence as a necessary ingredient of righteousness. The Christian cannot excuse violence except that history has shown that timely action against evil is important.

Perhaps the most important thing to understand is that Islamic terrorism is an ambiguously defined enemy. America is well defined opponent for Islam.

Posted in Current Issues | 2 Comments

GREEN is Not Just a Color Anymore

If I were to ask a 3-year-old, “What’s your favorite color?” I would typically expect to hear, blue, red or lellow. Brown would indeed surprise me as would teal, crimson, turquoise, chartreuse or any other elite color. Green is still a very nice color, but something has happened to GREEN. It is more than a color. It’s now an attitude, a mindset, a fervor sparked by the concept that earth, our home planet, is being damaged, even destroyed, if we do not step up to the task by “going GREEN.” . . . What?

I know that some young people are not fond of hearing their parents and grandparents reminisce. Excessive repetition notwithstanding, I don’t really understand that attitude. I’ve always loved to learn about the “olden days” from my parents and grandparents and their contemporaries. It’s never a mistake to consider the past. It’s how we all “got here.”

Desperate Recycling of Long Ago
Back when I was a kid growing up in California during World War II, I clearly remember recycling efforts. It was a big deal! Metals, including tin cans, lawn mowers, and even the foil of chewing gum wrappers were collected. We also recycled worn out tires. Rubber was very scarce because rubber trees were far away and transporting rubber was hazardous with enemy warships everywhere. Interestingly, synthetic rubber for tires was quickly developed.

Recycling was done not out of any consideration for going GREEN. It was done only to improve the availability of basic materials required in the war effort during WWII. I can guarantee you that absolutely no one was pre-occupied with concerns of global warming. The war was won by desperate actions such as recycling.

The New “High Calling” of GREEN
It seems that going GREEN is now the high calling of anyone who attended a US elementary school within the last 30 years. It easily catches the fancy of kids and sticks with them far into adulthood.

Going GREEN has many faces that are dead serious, yet well within the understanding of kids. It introduces students to a myriad of “earth concerns” such as endangered species, excessive logging, coal mining and coal burning, oil wells and pipelines, and the imbalance of greenhouse gasses in the earth’s atmosphere that we think might be causing global warming. We are talking here about things believed to be caused by the daily practices of human beings, things that seem to be within the realm of corrective action even for kids. Actually, much of the corrective action would call for significant reversal of lifestyle improvements.

Logging in Oregon
My wife and I live in Oregon where logging is king. I should say, “was king.” When we came here from California 45 years ago, there were lumber mills all over the state, each with a huge sawdust burner called a “wigwam.”

Clear cutting was and still is the most efficient way to log. The remaining “slash” was burned on site, to purge the land of pests before re-planting. It was a well reasoned process that produced a quality product.

But tourists and city dwellers complained about the “ugly” clear cuts and the smoke, a typical reaction from people who had no interest or understanding of the good that was being done. Too many of them thought that the trees would eventually be gone forever. The truth is that we have more trees than ever.

Near our home we have seen near-by clear cuts come and grow. About 40 years ago we planted several rows of Christmas trees. They grew too fast for us to do the proper grooming before harvest. Those trees are now tall enough (over 100 feet tall) to be good lumber.

Clear cuts start to look interesting after about 3 years. Young Douglas fir trees grow rapidly here in Western Oregon. They are typically ready for harvest in just 50 years. Yes, kids, I know that 50 years seems to you like a long time, but nobody has\to wait. Mature trees are always available. About 5 years, after planting, the new trees are large enough for me to stand among and hide. If you are over 20 years old, it is truly an inspiration to watch trees grow.


Young Oregon Forest

Young Oregon Forest

Kids and Trees
Yet it’s infinitely more inspiring to watch kids grow and truly mature into responsible adults. Trees do not become “responsible” with maturity, but they do become useful when they are harvested. Kids not only become useful before maturity, they also become responsible, productive and even creative as in the image of God himself. Trees become tall with maturity; kids become productive and creative with maturity.

Trees have an “after life” only if they are cut down and shaped. Kids have eternal life only if they live this life seeking God and believing in God. It isn’t the GREEN, “earth-first” agenda that brings eternal life.

The Green Agenda is being implemented.
Public lands in Oregon have been shut down with only private lands currently available for harvesting. Nature is doing the “forest management” for public lands and the United States is not a significant participant in the international dimensioned lumber market. We do ship our best un-milled logs abroad from our private lands.

In this slow economy few have noticed that logging in Oregon has slowed to a shuffle. The GREEN agenda has won this one, at least until things pick up.

The Global Warming Hypothesis Accepted without Proof
Politicians looking for revenue to finance governmental bureaucracies want to legislate and regulate power plant emissions and vehicle emissions so that violators can be taxed and fined for non-compliance. By targeting only large corporations, politicians avoid the ire of the voters. Unfortunately, few voters make the connection that penalizing large corporations has anything to do with them. When gasoline prices soar, they simply blame the big oil corporations and not their senators. The disconnect is huge and very destructive.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Steps in
Apparently Obama has taken charge and loves it. After a quiet takeover of the global warming debate, the EPA is now actively establishing the rules regulating control of carbon dioxide emissions. These rules, include the “Cap and Trade” shell game that creates a strange currency where air pollution liabilities are somehow bought and sold. I’m thinking that this will be best done in a fancy new Las Vegas casino.

    • We know that greenhouse gasses (such as CO2) are very
      natural phenomena.
    • We don’t know how much GH gasses influence the temperature
      of the atmosphere compared to other influences.
    • We don’t know with any certainty how significantly the
      activity of mankind is involved in causing global warming
    • Global temperature has not been correlated, to any useful
      extent, to expected undesireable effects . .

Mankind’s influence on Global warming is, very likely, insignificant. This EPA involvement is, at the least, a blatant tyrannical action. What we have here is a sobering demonstration of the huge gulf that separates the Obama Administration from the people. All of this is evidence that bureaucratic government must shrink so that
“. . . government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”— Abe Lincoln, the Gettysburg Address

Surely Abe is turning over in his grave!

Posted in Current Issues | Leave a comment

Can there be Peace in the Middle East ?

They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious.
‘Peace, peace,’ they say, when there is no peace.     Jer 6:14 NIV

Being eternal optimists, we constantly talk about world peace as if we can make it happen, yet in Matthew 24 Jesus said: “You will hear of wars and rumors of wars. . . . But the end is still to come.”

This is one of the few statements in chapter 24 that we can thoroughly understand because we are always hearing about war and some of us have seen it.

This doesn’t mean that we should quit our business as peacemakers. We Christians have the mandate to work among those weary of conflict to show them how to live in peace.

_________________________________________________

On February 11, 2011, a huge vacuum was created in Egypt when Hosni Mubarak relinquished his control of Egypt, by popular demand. Well, at least it was the loudest demand.

My question was: Does Egypt stay in limbo until its scheduled September election, or does some other leadership crash the scene? The demonstrators’ call was for “democracy,” implying to me the need to build a whole new government structure.

After what has seemed to be a long silence, I read today that Amed Shafiq, who was appointed as Egypt’s Prime Minister just weeks ago, has resigned. His replacement is Essam Sharaf who is getting mixed reviews from the revolutionaries, but this would probably be expected any way. Egypt’s supreme Military Council has today, March 3, 2011, appointed Sharaf to work on forming an interim government using input from the former president’s cabinet. We all hope and pray that these actions bring about an effective people’s government for Egypt so that will provide a constructive and soothing influence in the Middle East. So far, the Egyptian military is controlling the behavior of the Egyptian populace, to avoid full anarchy.

But no sooner were we overcome by the question of what will rush in to fill the huge Mubarak vacuum, we noticed a widespread upheaval already going on in virtually all Muslim nations in the region. Indeed, the Muslim nations lined up on the North African coast were all on fire with destructive demonstrations and unrest.

Tunisia, the site of ancient Carthage, was first.

Carthage Ruins

After receiving his university degree, Mohammed Bouazizi, age 26, returned to his Tunisian home to get on with his life and get a real job. Unfortunately, “letters” added to ones name do not guarantee a job anywhere. Indeed, a degree can render one “over qualified.” Even I ran into that specious problem way back in the dark ages after my college graduation. It helped me re-evaluate my aspirations and re-focus my job search. Fortunately, it showed me that my reserved personality couldn’t really fit the mold that my potential employers thought I needed in my anticipated career of broadcast engineering. Being an extreme extrovert and commensurately “crazy” just wasn’t “me.”

The result for me was to focus on my creativity in electronics. My first career employer, Collins Radio Company Pacific Division, saw that hope and gave me the perfect break.

I had my problems and Mohammed Bouazizi, had his, but he had two more than I. He had to seek employment when jobs were scarce, but worse, he had to seek employment within a society that had been mortally weakened by dependence upon the government. Keep this theme in mind as we proceed.

In direct reference to Tunisia, Brian Whittaker of www.gardian.co.uk says: “Finally, we are seeing the breakdown of a long-standing devil’s compact where, in return for submitting to life under a dictatorship, people’s economic and welfare needs are supposedly taken care of by the state.”

The only quibble I have with “Whittaker’s Theorem” is that it applies to any socialist government, not just a dictatorship. A full-blown oligarchy running a republic can socialize and anesthetize the populace so that people forget how to enjoy being productive. I’ve been watching developments that look like this right here in the United States.

Being taken care of is the attractive, but fatal, flaw that seduces us and weakens us until we cannot cope with the slightest challenge. Over these past weeks we have seen an explosive chain reaction throughout the Muslim states of North Africa and the Middle East. “Give us democracy,” they chant. Too many of them mean, “Take care of us.”

In the very same time frame, uprisings occurred in America, beginning in Wisconsin. Public employees, including some teachers, are shouting, in so many words, “Take care of us.” It’s pretty much the same complaint as in Tunisia, but with far less justification. Thankfully, real violence was not applied in Wisconsin. These are difficult times for all of us. The main difficulty that union members have that the rest of us don’t have is the burden of paying union dues, dues that end up promoting socialist structures that anesthetize us.

Most of us do not depend on the artificial power of parasitic unions that exist to lobby our legislators and to reshape our values. Unions have been damaging the education of our children by causing more teachers to focus on their physical comforts and financial benefits than on their fascinating job of sparking children to excel.

So when Mohammed Bouazizi decisively took charge of his life and established a produce stand in the city of Sidi Bouzid, authorities shut him down for lack of a permit. Already distressed, Mohammed saw no better way of “making a difference” than by public immolation.

On December 17, 2010, he set himself ablaze in the street. Another young man joined Bouazizi’s movement by climbing a power pole and, reaching for the wires, purposely electrocuting himself. Bouazizi was taken to the hospital and treated for his burns. He died there on January 5, 2010.

The Tunisian president, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali finally left Tunisia for somewhere in Saudi Arabia on January 16, 2011, as the people demanded. Now he and various members of his family are being sought for arrest. Large amounts of money have been taken from Tunisia.
The presidents of Algeria and Morocco have so far survived in a modicum of order after brutal demonstrations.

President of Algeria for 49 years, Abdelaziz Bouteflika is a pro at this. He recently lifted a 19-year state of emergency, lowered some prices, and has pledged almost $300-billion for development of the country. Algeria is a US partner and Muslim ally in the war on terrorism. Yet the populace is far from happy, and could become even more volatile.

But if I had to select the worst of the 5 Islamic nations on the North African Coast, it would be Libya.

Qaddafi

Its tyrant dictator of 42 years, Muammar Qaddafi, his family and faithful have maintained the iron hand. They have been murdering the rebels in the streets. Rebels are fighting to divide Libya into two sections in a manner that will reduce his power. Qaddafi vows that he will not release power. After all, Libyan high quality oil reserves are in great demand and Europe is it’s best consumer.
We have no evidence that the Libyan “powder keg” will be defused anytime soon.

Uprisings within Muslim countries seem to be common these days. At this point, the only Muslim states whose leaders have fled because of uprisings are Egypt and Tunisia.

Certainly we should pray for these oppressed victims of tyrants. They are everywhere in the world of Islam. Muslims are not intrinsically bad people. They yearn for peace just like we do. Somehow they must become open to the option of Jesus, but they’ve closed the door very tightly . There is only one person who can give them the peace that passes all understanding. It is Jesus, our advocate with the Father.

“Peace I leave with you, my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.” John 14:27

We will never find this peace in the Middle East or anywhere else in the world. We cannot make it happen between people or nations here on earth. Jesus is the only one who provides this inner peace. He provides it now.

You may go to the following link for some interesting additional information. It is a photo blog about Mohamed Bouazzi, the fruit vendor. You may need a broadband connection to view these high quality photos.

The second may have some updates regarding the Algeria situation.

http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/28/5941280-mohamed-bouazizi-the-fruit-vendor-whose-death-may-have-changed-the-arab-world

http://www.aolnews.com/story/algeria-braces-for-second-pro-democracy-rally/1584905/

Posted in Current Issues | 3 Comments

Burka Shock (updated 2/11/11)

The other day, I went shopping in a nearby Fred Meyer department store, heading for men’s shoes. My only casuals were these tennies with an array of “artfully” stitched-up panels of off-white to shades of gray and black. When they got dirty, my scrubbing made them look worse, because the surface color was removed. They are definitely not even close to wearing out, but I needed something more presentable.

Just as the main entrance door of the store was closing behind me I saw this large brown gunny sack coming from Women’s Clothes, walking across my path. Trying desperately not to stare, I nonchalantly looked for a face. It had none! But I saw two peepers through a black slit. Someone was inside, hiding. Then as I walked by the women’s clothing section, it’s identical twin was browsing the racks. No more looking. I went straight to Men’s Shoes. . . . . What would have happened, had I said “hello?” Mary probably would have fainted when I reported it. I report everything to Mary . . . almost everything. It’s usually safe.

Despite my intense focus on shopping for shoes, my head was spinning on those burkas. I couldn’t resolve their presence by using humor to make it trivial. Whether these women chose to make themselves invisible or their men folk forced them to do it, either way, for me, it looks demeaning for them. It urges me to think as though these burkas were deployed by some Islamic authority. It makes me feel like it’s supposed to mean, “Hello, America, Islam is here. What are you going to do about it?” Of course, it’s not what these women are trying to say.

I can’t be sure it’s an “in your face” tactic of Islam, but in the long run, knowing the little that we know about Islam, we’d be foolish to be complacent. Again, confronting these innocent women is certainly not the right approach. They have little choice. It’s probably their ingrained religious belief, otherwise they are just coming along to get along.

Along with this I had been watching TV coverage of the deadly riots in Egypt, where even internet access has been cut off. And what is the issue? We seem to be left with the notion that it’s pretty difficult for us to understand the nature of such a clash half-way around the world from us. Thanks to the reporters, the story came across as “Egyptians are tired of bad economic conditions and they want a change.” Mubarak, their president of the last 30 years, must go!

How simplistic! Demonstrations don’t rise to this level and continue for weeks without a more congenital cause.

But let me raise a disclaimer here. I do not know a lot about Islam, but I am very curious. No! I’m desperately trying to understand, but I’m getting no decent understanding about Islam. So I do get nervous when Islam makes its moves, whether it’s producing scary trick-or-treat gunny sacks or it’s flying hundreds of airline passengers into American buildings. Islam, whether it is peaceful, or it is simply getting its “jollies” by terrorizing unsuspecting populations is not acting rationally or helpfully. It is not trying to give us information we can act upon. Call me “Islam-o-phobic” all you want to, but I think Islam is not interested in being rational, reasonable or civilized. It’s only interest is to be weird and scary . . . and deadly.

What little I know about Egypt is that they are mostly Muslim, with a huge Muslim Brotherhood “local 911.” Egypt does include a substantial Coptic Christian contingent. We do know that Muslims around the world hold that Israel and America are the greatest hot-beds for infidels. The word “infidel” is a Muslim generalization for non-Muslims, particularly Jews and Christians who must be eradicated. The word is always a comparative that depends on whose side you are on.

Despite denials from our own president, the “Muslim Brotherhood” seems to be the main opposition to Hosni Mubarak. After “enduring” Mubarak yea these 30-odd years, the demonstrations and riots clearly speak of opportunism. The octogenarian, Mubarak, has weakened. The powerful Egyptian military is ready. The fullness of time has come for the Brotherhood to “salvage” Egypt.

The best I can determine is that the Brotherhood was developed out of Wahhabism and is a major proponent of the purest form of Islam, the extremist form. The “Brotherhood” has a lot of financial power, is very influential in Islam and is focused in terrorist activity. So when you naively try to cozy up to your neighborhood Muslim who is very nice to you, go ahead and be very nice to him in return. Just remember there is another face to Islam that is vicious and full of contempt and hatred for us. They have caused us to put up our guard by applying such measures as body searches in our airports.

Our wavering, yet world-power savoring, president is saying that America must not tell Egypt how to act in their current civil strife. Even I consider his position this time as the height of wisdom, but not for his reasons. It seems dreadfully obvious that whatever America proffers will become justification enough for the Brotherhood to stir the pot against infidel America.

Why then did Obama suggest to Mubarak that he offer this as his last term as president? At that the protesters loudly responded, and the Egyptian Military still sits there, vowing not to limit the actions of the protesters. Well, so much for wisdom.

George Bush, after 911, declared that Islam is a great religion. And then somehow it got around that Islam is a religion of peace. Actually, it’s the most widespread religion on earth simply because it was spread by violence. Particularly now, It continues to be the greatest agent for violence and Christian persecution in the world. Yet even with the surreal demonstration of 911, we thought it impolite to blame Islam, excusing the attack as the work of Islamic extremism. But Islamic extremism is acclaimed by the Wahabis and the Muslim Brotherhood as the purest form of Islam. These powerful sects of Islam are determined to, first of all eradicate Israel, while continuing to infiltrate innocuous Muslim forms into Western Europe and North America as a foot-hold.

So why are the burkas now being deployed in American suburban clothing stores? Is it simply to make us more comfortable toward another strange culture? Or is it a brazen step from the other “face” of Islam, the “purer” form of Islam, that as always, is seeking to subjugate another society of “infidels” under the rule of their warrior-prophet, Mohammed.

Muslims say they recognize Jesus as a prophet, (It’s in the Koran) but they do not know him or follow him who said, ”. . . all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.”

Islam has a billion souls deceived. We do not condemn them who act in innocence. From the cross, Jesus prayed, “Father forgive them for they do not know what they are doing.”

It is time for us to pray for those billion souls. It’s time for us to pray: “Father forgive them for they do not know what they are doing.”

Today is 02/11/2011, Mubarak has stepped down.

. . . . Jesus is my peace and comfort, much much more than my new Soft Stag shoes.

Posted in Current Issues | 1 Comment

What’s New About Christmas?


How can anyone write something new and different about Christmas? It would seem that over these past 2,014 Christmases, everything possible must have been said and written, everything including the factoid that Jesus was born probably in 4 BC.   

Jesus was born 4 years before Christ . . . .   Get it?   

The problem is not with God and His timing. No. His timing is always perfect. This obvious error is man-made. But it was done despite honorable intentions.   

In the year 525 the Roman monk, Dionysis Exeguus, considered to be a fairly good mathematician of his day, took on the task of establishing a calendar referenced to Jesus. Until then, calendars in use were based on various historic events including the creation of earth. But over a couple of centuries following Dionysis, his calendar became the basis for the Julian calendar and subsequently the Gregorian calendar, the one used almost universally today.   

Although I have never tried it myself, I can fully appreciate the complications of trying to establish an accepted world calendar. Therefore my sincere and grateful appreciation goes to Dionysis Exeguus who spared me the mind-bending task. 

Others throughout history have also contributed to my well-being. 

One of my favorites, Thomas Edison, with his 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, brought non-flickering light into my long winter evenings.  

Henry Ford brought practical personal transportation, increasing a day’s journey to more than two hundred miles, and at the same time, relieving the aches and pains of feet and thighs. 

Johannes Gutenberg, with his printing press improved the world with a leap in the way information is made available and shared. 

But the greatest and best change ever to happen in this world was the coming of Christ. Although He was “long expected and desired,” we were so bound up in our own efforts to “design” Him and His kingly mission, that many at the time missed His coming. That was 2,014 years (or so) ago, and despite the joyful hullabaloo of the Christmas “season,” most of us still misunderstand Jesus and His purpose.   

I am part of a small Bible study group currently studying the Gospel of John. On the one hand, I find its reading cadence to be quite awkward and somewhat boring. Yet on the other hand, there is no book in the Bible that presents God’s plan of salvation more clearly and simply than the Gospel according to John. The very first chapter so clearly describes the ministry of the Word-made-flesh and how we as redeemed human beings can participate with the Creator who desires to work within us to bring His eternal purpose to mankind. Jesus, the “son of man” demonstrated the feasibility. 

As Nicodemus (in Chapter 3) could not understand, we too are so engrossed with our constructed “wisdom” that we cannot (or don’t want to) pick up on the simple concept of being born again.  It simply means that we put aside the mess that we are in and “re-boot” with Jesus. Occasionally, we may have to do it yet again. God won’t give up on us if we don’t give up on Him. 

But I must caution you. . . this does not mean that we assume that failure or simply “imperfection” is our lot and we must continually start over from the beginning.  The computer analogy still works: We continue in our good work and save it often. If our work has been good, we keep it and continue on to the goal that God has for us. Rebooting over and over is not required, unless we fail to rid ourselves of “malware” or do not correct existing “registry errors.” At this point I shall discontinue the computer analogy; it might unnecessarily confuse some people, including me. Understanding computer jargon is not prerequisite.   

The apostle Paul reminds us: 

“What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?” Romans 6:1,2 NIV 

Paul is right! We don’t need confessional liturgy that assumes we can’t stop sinning. We don’t need a Lenten Season that slaps us down for no reason other than to force repentance even when we are on the right track. Done year after year it forces us to eventually give up.

And so it was that Jesus was born into a sinful world, with the purpose of bringing hope, salvation and peace of heart to those who take Him in. It had to be conditional on our acceptance of Jesus as Savior, else we would be no more than robots to Him. 

Thomas Alva Edison brought us the incandescent light bulb, others brought us arc lamps, florescent bulbs and light-emitting diodes. 

Henry Ford brought us the automobile. Others brought airplanes, trains, steamboats and ocean liners. 

Johannes Gutenberg brought us the printing press. Others brought us radio broadcasting, television and the internet. All of these and more were brought by God-given creativity and ingenuity. To reject any of these seems so ridiculous because they seem to be so useful and necessary. 

God brought us Jesus, but we easily reject Him because we think we already have what we need. We think what we want is what we need. We don’t know the difference between need and want. We really need Jesus but we’re so confused about what we need and want that we easily reject what we really need and what will really satisfy. 

And so, how can I write something new and different about Christmas? I can’t. It’s all been said before. Everything we need to read about Christmas has already been written. The coming of Jesus is such an old, old story. It’s not really wanted. But it’s always been what’s needed. By repeating it in different words, perhaps another person will catch on. 

Christmas is not about December 25. I’m really sort of glad that we don’t know the true date of Jesus’ birth. It has nothing to do with Christmas. Christmas is about the good old news of Salvation and it can be discovered any day of any year!

Posted in Words of Life | 3 Comments

Utopia via Philanthropy?

Can philanthropy change mankind into what it needs to be?  George Soros thinks so.  The problem is that we can’t trust him to get it right.  Yet he has the scepter.  It’s called money.  He’s swinging that thing as if he’s been granted special powers.  It’s obvious that this 80-year-old man is feeling his mortality.  He’s under time-pressure to get some things done even though he has children who will probably carry on.  Hey!  I’m just 3 years younger.  Except for his wealth, and his world view,  I understand the time crunch. 

Read what Soros said just last week: 

“When you try to, say, improve society.  You affect different people and different interests differently.  And they’re not actually commensurate.  So you very often have all kinds of unintended adverse consequences.

So, I had to experiment, and it was a learning process.  The first part was this subversive activity, disrupting repressive regimes.  That was a lot of fun.  And that’s actually what got me hooked on this whole enterprise, seeing what works in one country, trying it in the other countries, so it developed as a matrix.  In fact we had national foundations, then we had certain specialized activities. 

I became concerned with the problems of globalization where you have global markets but you have  politics based on the sovereignty of  states.  So how do you deal with that issue.  And then I came to the realization that open society is endangered by our current leadership in this country.  And that is when I refocused my attention on the United States.” 

So the problem is right here in “River City?”   

Establishing perfect global societies

George Soros

What audacity!  What arrogance!  This guy is obviously so bound up in himself that there is absolutely no chance that he can be objective enough to use his wealth for the common good.   His website (www.soros.org) raises the banner for “Open Societies.” 

But I have to tell you, I’m glad the old man said this out loud so that we could listen.  I had this idea that Soros was a man lurking in the shadows.  No! Apparently he is openly begging for us to see how great and powerful he is.  Actually we needed this hard evidence so that we can now wake up to what’s happening in our world.  His message sounds so braggadocio and sinister that “it can’t be real,” yet it is.  Mr. Soros is causing untold suffering just so he can play with his money and actually ignore the squirming and screaming he’s causing.  It’s diabolical!  He says he’s being “subversive” toward repressive regimes.  That’s not the way it works.  The first to suffer are those already suffering and barely surviving.  The repressive leaders probably don’t feel a thing.  Soros doesn’t get into this except to say he encountered “unintended adverse consequences.” I don’t think Soros is interested in showing sorrow for those he hurts.   

One of Mr. Soros’ clear agenda items is to create “open” societies into what purports to be the highest and noblest model for a global society.  Frankly, I don’t know what that means, except “coercion.”  It is very difficult to call the world into one such mold except for two things:  It needs to become a path of lesser resistance and there are people like George Soros who will throw their vast fortunes into it.  In simple terms, money talks. 

But let me not veer from the real problem here.  The threat is not just his global idealism, it’s his disregard for how his efforts add to human suffering.  He appears to have no  conscience.  “The end justifies the means,” is an old communist dictum carried out behind the “iron curtain,” long ago, far away and forgotten.  Folks, we MUST remember.  Many of our problems are due to faded memories. 

Philanthropy is not bad, but its motives must be understood and taken into account.  It comes to its greatest expression in old men who are wealthy, because wealth gives them voice.  Old men, almost without exception, want to leave a mark.  

An earlier philanthropist comes to mind, Andrew Carnegie. who became the richest man in the world.  Now don’t get me wrong.  Carnegie is not the ultimate good example either.  Much can be said about his lack of concern for the common laborers he used, particularly at the Homestead steel mill in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  Carnegie seem to be oblivious of his responsibility for the well-being of these workers, oblivious except for one thing.  When he began to pull away from the steel industry he began to get rid of his wealth by giving it away to help people.  It could be that he was trying to turn to philanthropy (The love of mankind) as a way of removing guilt for the mistreatment of men.  

Carnegie is known for his support of causes for world peace.  He was the first to talk about a League of Nations.  He built a Palace of Peace at The Hague, later to become the World Court.  He met with Kaiser Wilhelm in order to dissuade him in steps toward war.  It is known that he was extremely disappointed that his effort did not prevent the First World War.  

Andrew Carnegie financed thousands of libraries, built all over America, and around the world. They are still well known. 

In all, Carnegie gave away 350 million dollars. 

Even for philanthropists, the vision of changing the world for the better is frustrating.  In that regard, Carnegie’s story is sad, but with some final brightness.  

George Soros, today’s popular “philanthropist,” may be feeling some guilt, but it is completely undetectable.  He loves to destroy banks and currencies, and to devastate the lives of millions.  It’s a known fact because he brags about it.  Yet there is nothing to show that he knows what the word philanthropy means.  

It now stands to reason that Soros may have had some influence in the borrowing of trillions of dollars as stimulus money, an action that has not helped our economy but has assured our continuing economic troubles.  From what I now know about George Soros, he would like that.           

Just remember the context of his words regarding his experimenting with the economies of nations.  Go back to his speech if you must.  

Let me re-echo his words: “And that is when I refocused my attention on the United States.”  

Alas, we are his target and the target of other foes.  Beware and be wise.  Remember and cherish what we were given.  If enough take these warnings we may yet survive with our unique blessings.  Meanwhile be thankful for those who followed our God and brought us their insight.    

Conspiracy theories are generally ignored.  But there is so much known about Soros, that we must pay attention.  George may go back into the shadows, but we have to be ever watchful.  Wealth is the fertilizer of conspiracies. 

There are 14 billion dollars here in the Soros scepter.

Posted in Wolves in Sheep's Clothing | 2 Comments

The Best Things in Life are Free


It was 1947 and I was about 15 years old when I first heard a remarkable “new” popular song: “The Best Things in Life are Free.” 

Actually, it wasn’t new, but 20 years old by the time I heard it.  It was a song re-packaged from the 1927 musical: “Good News.”  It’s message was wonderful!  It sounded so good, pure and true!  This song was wonderfully and simply contemplative, a “truth” to mull over and examine, a truth to live by.  

The moon belongs to everyone
The best things in life are free,
The stars belong to everyone
They gleam there for you and me.
The flowers in Spring,
The robins that sing,
The sunbeams that shine
They’re yours, They’re mine!
And love can come to everyone,
The best things in life are free.

Ahh yes, for me, 1947 was an age of innocence. Although some popular songs were subtly naughty by using double meanings, I cannot recall the blatant 4-letter bombs ever being used in popular songs.  Most popular songs were jazzy with sing-able melody and lyrics, and although a comfortable bass was enjoyed, a heavy beat would never overcome the lyrics.    

This song had a simple charm because it offered all this good stuff for free. Everybody likes “free.” 

But this song was taunting me.  I was not able to see its implementation into real life.  I was a high school sophomore, struggling with the need to challenge this simple, innocent song.

I began with the prospect of owning the moon for free.  If I were owning it, no one else could have a free moon.  Indeed, the song said, “The moon belongs to everyone.”  What good is a “free” moon that is common property, shared by 4 billion human beings?  And that’s not even counting other moon lovers such as coyotes and wolves. 

One more problem: Although a radar beam had been successfully bounced off the moon, it was not reachable.  NASA did not exist. 

How brilliant I felt!   

Unbeknownst to me at the time, there was a word for having confidence, without quite enough information to support the confidence.  The word is “sophomoric.”  Yep!  I was simply “sophomoric.”  (I am still occasionally caught in sophomoria.) 

Back to the song.

The problem is similar for owning stars that, “gleam there for you and me.”  At least there are plenty of stars to go around, but we can’t own them as a block.

Oh, this reminds me.  Have you heard the annual radio advertisements just before Christmas that offer a place in the “Star Registry?”  It’s the perfect Christmas gift, but it’s not free.  For a price, you can buy a certificate identifying the star that you have named in honor of your gift recipient.  It takes care of those on your Christmas shopping list who already “have everything.”  What an overt sham!  Those shysters at the star registry need  to understand that our song, “The Best Things in Life are Free,” has been giving out stars for free since 1927.  The “star registry” needs to cease and desist.

Onward!  When we get to the “flowers, robins and sunbeams,” there is a bit more room for reality.  Except for the overhead of providing bird feed and flower seed, we probably have enough birds and flowers to go around.

But now, we have an attitude problem.  The song says, “They’re yours, they’re mine!”  Note the exclamation point!  Here the song is definitely giving us the wrong message.  The song seems to be demanding that we become greedy.  In  bald face words we are told we own the flowers, robins and sunbeams outright.  Really?  And what did we pay?  Nothing!

Finally, “love can come to everyone.”  For free?  . . . . .  Please. . . .  I was only a sophomore.  I was at a complete loss to fathom this one.      

But what can we conclude after this rigorous analysis? 

Or worse, what can we do when we’re caught red-handed with extra sunbeams in our hair.  What can we do when the authorities discover a robin in our hand and another in the bush?  Just blame the song?

Now, 62 years later, I am much older and wiser.  I actually know what the song is all about.  I’ve never seen the show: Good News, so there’s a slight chance that the true meaning of the “The Best Things” was revealed in the show’s story line.  I doubt it.

In reading a short synopsis of Good News, I discovered that even the characters Tom and Connie who sing the duet and agree that, “The Best Things in Life are Free,” were simply infatuated by this charming idea that they had in common.  It brought them together in romance, and as far as the story line goes, that was all it was supposed to do.

It’s sad to realize that even the song writers,  B.G. DeSylva, Lew Brown, and Ray Henderson, seemed to be clueless.  They did not explain what this was about. 

It’s about God’s love that comes to us in so many ways regardless of what we do to deserve it.  We don’t pay for it, we don’t perform for it.  It simply comes.  Everyone gets to experience this wonderful unilateral love from God. 

I do believe, however, that if we do not recognize the source, and do not share with others the knowledge of who is blessing us, we will eventually forget what God is doing for us and therefore will eventually not be able to enjoy His blessings and love.  By shutting Him out, it will seem to us that God is not there.    

“Give thanks to the LORD, call on his name;
Make known among the nations what he has done,
And proclaim that his name is exalted.
Sing to the LORD,
For he has done glorious things;
Let this be known to all the world.
Shout aloud and sing for joy, people of Zion,
For great is the Holy One of Israel among you.”

Isaiah 12:4-6

Isaiah’s practical admonition of long ago applies to us TODAY!
God’s blessings are indeed FREE, but properly directed thanksgiving is expected.

Posted in Words of Life | 1 Comment

Problems of Communicating

When I began blogging, I really did try to consider the hazards.  I knew that some of you would like almost anything I wanted to write.  Some of you told me so.   But, realist that I am, I knew that not everything would be greeted by cheers and chants of “right on!”  There are some things, often the more vital issues of life, that can arouse very negative responses.

You are my friends; you are my family.  But there is no way that we can always agree.  Each of us is influenced by experiences that are very different among us.  Yet our relationship is precious and I have no intention of damaging that in the slightest.  It should be mutually useful for us to communicate out of our varied experiences. 

I very purposely was careful to make my early blogging attempts warm and fuzzy.  I call it, “fluff.”  One article was  about photography and another was about the “need” for excuses to get out and enjoy God’s creation.  Even the article: “Creativity – In the Image of God” was not expected to be seriously controversial.  In the world of fluff, nothing is controversial.  We don’t have to walk as if we might tread on eggs or accidently hurt someone’s feelings.

But the real world is not fluff, not after you reach the third grade or so.  I believe something is wrong if we cannot venture into the maturity of the real world.  We shouldn’t need to wear our feelings on our elbows.  There comes a time when “sheltering” should cease.  Yes, that time is different for different people.

This is not to give license to our running roughshod over anyone unless they are doing damage.  Our example, Jesus Christ, is a good one to follow.  He was roughshod  with the religious hierarchy who hadn’t a clue about God’s love.  But he taught love and compassion to their victims.  E.g. The woman caught in adultery, and the story of the Good Samaritan.  Jesus recognized the faith of the Roman Centurion who was generally despised by the population in Galilee and Judaea. 

Currently in our American society we have a real bottleneck, a highly polarized situation, standing in the way of communication between us.  It’s the “liberal/conservative” debate.  Actually, it’s not really a debate.  It’s a confrontation.  It’s talking without listening. 

It’s been my observation that most liberals think they don’t need to listen because theirs is the upper hand: They have the winning voter base because liberals are more concerned about protecting the environment and taking care of human need.  Did Jesus say the government was supposed to do all that for us?  Hardly.

Conservatives think they need to talk and rant because liberals don’t listen.  They need to talk because their message is not popular; it’s about taking responsibility.  It’s about using the resources that we have so that jobs can be created and more people can take care of themselves. There will always be resources, they seem to say.

Now I know better than to claim to be a moderate.  That’s what some liberals do.  I’m a Christian and Jesus said I can’t serve two masters.  Yes, I’m conservative if you needed a confession.  To me being conservative means that I take responsibility and in taking responsibility, God will supply all our needs…  not all of our wants, but all of our needs.  And further, no one can properly take responsibility without having received blessings, blessings from God himself.

Yes, I’m still talking about communication.  Communication is about knowing where people are “coming from.”  And you need to know where I’m “coming from.”

Communication is not about agreeing.  It’s about understanding.  Agreement might come, but it’s not required.  I can live without agreement and still love you.  By the way, love isn’t always reciprocal even with agreement, but it’s certainly better that way.

 

Dick

Posted in Words of Life | Leave a comment

Creativity – In the Image of God

The very first thing we read from the Bible is that God went on what looks to us like a creative spree. At the end of each day, we know that God was having a good time because when He inspected his work, as any good craftsman would do, He saw that “it was very good.” And it appears that He was sharing His pleasure with someone else. (?)

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” – Gen 1:26 NIV

So mankind is somehow an “image” of God. That image, that likeness, is in no way a duplication of God, but there are things that set us apart from other creatures. For starters, we have status above all other creatures.

It’s apparent that God wanted to crown His creative work with a creative class of beings who could choose to live in a special relationship with Himself. He didn’t want the relationship to be mandatory. He wanted the relationship to be a choice, thus greatly increasing the value of the relationship. Adam and Eve were the first members of that class; but willful disobedience destroyed their opportunity to enjoy that special relationship with God.

It is vividly apparent that mankind was purposely created with the wherewithal to learn much detail about God’s creation. Over the centuries, human understanding of physical things has developed by observing and studying facets of God’s creation such as, gravity, bird flight, comets, seasons, herbs, tar pits, tides, etc. Still more discoveries are left to be made. Out of these discoveries, humans have “created” such marvels as aircraft, spacecraft, special fuels, electric motors, x-rays, antibiotics, and much much more.

Let’s not forget that architecture, sculpturing, painting, music, drama, writing and photography are also true forms of creativity. These are often inspired by God’s examples of artful creativity in mountains, rivers, skies and seas, as well as plants and animals both wild and domesticated.

I enjoy using photography to remind me, and to share with others, something of the beauty of God’s creation. Photography is the example I’m most familiar with, so indulge me for a moment.

God’s creation is out there available for all to see. So what can I add by going out there and simply make a “counterfeit” view of what God did?

Well, first of all, when I am out there surrounded on all sides plus up and down, it’s impossible to capture and take it all home. You’ve heard about the kid in the candy store challenged to pick only one type of candy. That’s the challenge I have as a photographer. I can only pick one candy at a time. It’s a “creativity” challenge on the one hand, but a fascinating multi-dilemma for me on the other. I usually try to capture what others might miss.

Next, I am concerned about whether I have the best framing of the scene. Is there a better foreground or counter object to give depth and balance? How about color accents? Is the scene too cluttered with “interesting” stuff? Sometimes a very simple picture is better than trying to include too much. With the advent of digital photography it’s no problem to snap the shutter a few more times with a little change in angle each time. And I always shoot to include a little more of the scene so that I have the option of cropping the finished product differently.

But here’s my real problem:
I’d truly enjoy all of this as a process even if I had no one with whom to share the photos. It would indeed be useful to help me re-live my travels. But when I ask myself: “In all honesty, why do you like to take pictures?” My answer comes back: “I want to share what I’ve seen with others.” I know for sure, my wonderful wife enjoys them. When I post them on the internet, typically the same 3 or 4 people declare their enjoyment. Occasional responses are sufficient. I think there may be others who enjoy them but never respond. But I can’t be sure.

Constructive criticism is appreciated just as much, sometimes more, than routine expressions of enjoyment.

If no one, including my wife, ever showed any interest in my photos, my interest in photography would cease or at least be extremely curtailed.

All creativity, including God’s, is motivated by a desire to share the pleasure. I do believe God is pleased when we express our pleasure to Him. Let’s keep circulating the pleasure of God among us.

Posted in Words of Life | 2 Comments